Blog

Morrison Mahoney Associate Brian Suslak obtained a defense verdict in a jury trial at the Boston Municipal Court, Central Division. Liability on the part of our client was admitted prior to trial, so the only issue for the jury was the plaintiff’s alleged damages.

Joe secured declaratory judgment finding that the insurer properly disclaimed an uninsured motorist claim arising from a police chase.

Morrison Mahoney Partner Jeff O’Connor obtained a defense verdict following an eight day legal malpractice jury trial in Hampden Superior Court. The plaintiffs alleged that our client, their former attorney, provided negligent advice and representation in connection with their purchase of a new home, resulting in their being responsible for upwards of $70,000 in costs to repair alleged defective conditions on the property.

Morrison Mahoney Partner John Knight and Associate Brian Manikowski recently obtained a favorable verdict in Suffolk Superior Court in a case resulting from the collision of a public transit bus with a building in Revere.

Morrison Mahoney Partner Michael Racette obtained a “no negligence” defense verdict after a one-week medical malpractice jury trial in Berkshire Superior Court before Judge John Agostini.

Morrison Mahoney Partners Brent Tingle and Tony Abeln recently prevailed in a wrongful death / medical malpractice case following a three-day arbitration. The case was arbitrated because of extremely complex medical issues that would have been difficult for a jury to understand.

Morrison Mahoney Of Counsel Jeff Swanson successfully obtained summary judgment in a multi-vehicle accident case, involving eight vehicles that occurred during an ice storm.

Morrison Mahoney Partner Mike Keller and Associate Eva Kolstad recently obtained a decision from the Connecticut Appellate Court affirming the trial court’s granting of the defendants’ motion to dismiss in a legal malpractice case.

Morrison Mahoney Partner Tory Weigand discusses The Weight of the Evidence: “Snow Storms In Mid-May”

Our Planning Board client conducted multiple hearings and approved the subject application with stipulations that would benefit the overall area in terms of eradication of water run-off and groundwater saturation. A property owner objector instituted an action in the Superior Court against the Board for its approval.